Hocus Pocus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Hocus Pocus.

Hocus Pocus | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Hocus Pocus.
This section contains 540 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert Phillips

SOURCE: A review of Hocus Pocus, in The Hudson Review, Vol. XLIV, No. 1, Spring, 1991, pp. 135-36.

In the excerpt below, Phillips criticizes Vonnegut's style in Hocus Pocus.

In closing [Hocus Pocus], I was reminded of John Jay Chapman's remark: "When I put down a book by Stevenson, I swear I am hungry for something to read." Kurt Vonnegut's book left me hungry indeed; it is almost totally devoid of some standard ingredients of fiction—dialogue, form, confrontation, coherent plot. The author relies almost totally on the narrator and his one point of view. And the narration comes to us tricked-up with "unconventional lines separating passages within chapters" which "indicate where one scrap ended and the next began. The shorter the passage, the shorter the scrap" ("Editor's Note"). The narrator did not have access to uniform writing paper, see? The writer, locked up in a library and facing trial...

(read more)

This section contains 540 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert Phillips
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Robert Phillips from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.