V. S. Naipaul | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of V. S. Naipaul.

V. S. Naipaul | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of V. S. Naipaul.
This section contains 858 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Richard Plant

SOURCE: “Potpourri of the Antilles,” in Saturday Review, Vol. 51, No. 23, June 8, 1968, p. 52.

In the following review, Plant dismisses the title story of A Flag on the Island as another example of Naipaul's defeatist and predictably pessimistic attitude about the effects of colonialism, but also offers warm praise for the dialogue and humor in the other short stories included.

There must be two V. S. Naipauls: One, in full control of his materials, sets up a world populated by beautifully rendered West Indian, Hindu, or British people, and keeps his plot line so tense he never lets go. The second appears a prey to certain appetites and obsessions and tends to dissipate both story and characters. Here the nonhero watches himself carry out self-destructive deeds, then watches himself watching, and analyzes the analysis. In these happenings the leading men like to drift into dimly lit, dimly described barrooms, devour...

(read more)

This section contains 858 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Richard Plant
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Richard Plant from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.