Ueda Akinari | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Ueda Akinari.

Ueda Akinari | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Ueda Akinari.
This section contains 8,637 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by James T. Araki

SOURCE: Araki, James T. “A Critical Approach to the Ugetsu monogatari.Monumenta Nipponica 22, nos. 1-2 (1967): 49-64.

In the following essay, Araki offers an overview of criticism of Akinari's tales and an analysis of the structural techniques the author employed in Tales of Moonlight and Rain.

1 a Survey of Critical Approaches

Ueda Akinari aspired to distinction as a poet and classical scholar. His reputation in Japanese literary history today, however, rests almost exclusively on his genius as a writer of short stories—particularly of the Ugetsu monogatari (Tales of the Misty Moon), a collection of nine short mysterious tales which he completed probably in 1768. Those in the West who have read the Ugetsu monogatari in translation1 may have felt that some of the tales are curiously composed, and may have questioned their excellence. Apparent even in translation is a diversity among the nine tales in their structural characteristics and...

(read more)

This section contains 8,637 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by James T. Araki
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by James T. Araki from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.