Troilus and Cressida | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 41 pages of analysis & critique of Troilus and Cressida.

Troilus and Cressida | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 41 pages of analysis & critique of Troilus and Cressida.
This section contains 7,127 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Patricia Thomson

SOURCE: "Rant and Cant in Troilus and Cressida," in Essays and Studies, n.s. Vol. 22, 1969, pp. 33-56.

In the following essay, Thomson studies the expressive rhetoric used in Troilus and Cressida.

Questioning the Duke of Edinburgh's faith in 'Word-Power', an anonymous writer has recently asked: 'is not our own society, at least, one in which fluency remains a somewhat suspect achievement, in love as much as in politics?' Society under Elizabeth I, with rhetoric a recognized study in grammar school and university, was very much less sceptical. The modern reader may therefore sometimes, unhistorically, suspect a Word-Power in which Shakespeare believed. Henry V, for instance, exemplifies in council and in war the true eloquence of a leader whose thoughts and actions always match his words and whose 'sweet and honey'd sentences' are justly appraised as virtuous adjuncts of the royal character (Henry V, I. i. 50): on a...

(read more)

This section contains 7,127 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Patricia Thomson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Patricia Thomson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.