The Castle of Indolence | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of The Castle of Indolence.

The Castle of Indolence | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 12 pages of analysis & critique of The Castle of Indolence.
This section contains 3,586 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William Bayne

SOURCE: "The Castle of Indolence," in James Thomson, Oliphant Anderson, 1922, pp. 129-43.

In the following study, originally published in 1898, of The Castle of Indolence, Bayne places the poem between the tradition of Edmund Spenser, whose Faery Queen Thomson deliberately imitated, and poetic innovations that looked forward to Romanticism in general and John Keats in particular. Bayne examines both Thomson's aesthetic method and the strength of his poem as an allegorical narrative.

Spenser was a long-established favourite of Thomson's, and he therefore took up a very congenial piece of work when he began his Castle of Indolence, avowedly based upon the great epic narrative of the 'poet's poet.' The poem was begun, according to his own words, as early as 1733, and engaged his attention at intervals of more or less duration till its publication in 1748. It formed another 'departure' in his poetry. The intention of the writer obviously...

(read more)

This section contains 3,586 words
(approx. 12 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William Bayne
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by William Bayne from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.