Thomas Occleve | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Thomas Occleve.

Thomas Occleve | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Thomas Occleve.
This section contains 8,359 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Anna Torti

SOURCE: Torti, Anna. “Specular Narrative: Hoccleve's Regement of Princes.” In Glass of Form: Mirroring Structures from Chaucer to Skelton, pp. 87-106. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1991.

In the following essay, from her study of mirror metaphors in medieval English literature, Torti discusses Hoccleve's Regement of Princes in terms of its function as autobiography. Torti argues that in his construction of a “mirror” in which Prince Henry can see examples of statesmanship, Hoccleve often reflects an image of himself.

Critical evaluation of Thomas Hoccleve as a mere imitator of Chaucer has had too long a currency,1 and Hoccleve himself is partly to blame for this. His references to Chaucer are numerous. In the Regement of Princes he apostrophizes his ‘maister’ as ‘flour of eloquence, / Mirour of fructuous entendement, / O, vniuersel fadir in science’ (1962-4), and, using the diminutio technique, contrasts Chaucer's excellence with his own inability to express himself correctly...

(read more)

This section contains 8,359 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Anna Torti
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Anna Torti from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.