Things Falling Apart | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of Things Falling Apart.

Things Falling Apart | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of Things Falling Apart.
This section contains 4,299 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Damian U. Opata

SOURCE: “Eternal Sacred Order versus Conventional Wisdom: A Consideration of Moral Culpability in the Killing of Ikemefuna in Things Fall Apart,” in Research in African Literatures, Vol. 18, No. 1, Spring, 1987, pp. 71–79.

In the following essay, Opata argues that the character Okonkwo was not morally culpable when he killed Ikemefuna in Things Fall Apart because he was following the sacred order of the oracle.

As the man who had cleared his throat drew up and raised his matchet, Okonkwo looked away. He heard the blow. The pot fell and broke in the sand. He heard Ikemefuna cry, “My father, they have killed me!” as he ran towards him. Dazed with fear, Okonkwo drew his matchet and cut him down. He was afraid of being thought weak.

(Things Fall Apart 43)

Okonkwo's killing of Ikemefuna—his knottiest moral dilemma in the novel—has generally been seen by critics as an unconscionable act...

(read more)

This section contains 4,299 words
(approx. 15 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Damian U. Opata
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Damian U. Opata from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.