The Taming of the Shrew | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of The Taming of the Shrew.

The Taming of the Shrew | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of The Taming of the Shrew.
This section contains 5,382 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter Saccio

SOURCE: “Shrewd and Kindly Farce,” in Shakespeare Survey, Vol. 37, 1984, pp. 33-40.

In the essay below, Saccio examines the farcical nature of The Taming of the Shrew. After highlighting the negative ideas generally associated with farce, Saccio provides a positive appraisal of the farcical elements in the play and goes on to show how the play blends farce with romantic character development.

If Shakespeare's plays exemplify what humankind can achieve at its most vital, most thoughtful, and most sympathetic, not only a source of received wisdom but also a resource for those at odds with the received culture, The Taming of the Shrew remains an embarrassment to many who profess and call themselves Shakespearians.1 In our century a brisk revisionism has flourished. Two major series of scholiasts, the first generally modern and psychological, the second specifically feminist, have argued variously that the shrew never really was a shrew but...

(read more)

This section contains 5,382 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter Saccio
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Peter Saccio from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.