The Owl and the Nightingale | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of The Owl and the Nightingale.

The Owl and the Nightingale | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of The Owl and the Nightingale.
This section contains 2,125 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Constance B. Hieatt

SOURCE: Hieatt, Constance B. “The Subject of the Mock-Debate between the Owl and the Nightingale.” Studia Neophilologica 40 (1968): 155-60.

In the following essay, Hieatt describes The Owl and the Nightingale as a “gentle satire” on a broad range of subjects both serious and mundane, suggesting that the work avoids any specific conclusions in order to remain a light, humorous parody of lively debate.

The meaning of The Owl and the Nightingale is a subject on which many critics have voiced opinions, but on which no two appear to agree. Wells felt that it is “beneath all didactic”,1 and, while he was not entirely clear as to what it is didactic about, he saw the poem as presenting a serious and a joyous view of life, and attempting to show the need for both aspects: “God made the world not merely for lamenting and for consoling distress, but as well...

(read more)

This section contains 2,125 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Constance B. Hieatt
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Constance B. Hieatt from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.