The Owl and the Nightingale | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of The Owl and the Nightingale.

The Owl and the Nightingale | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 24 pages of analysis & critique of The Owl and the Nightingale.
This section contains 6,719 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by R. Barton Palmer

SOURCE: Palmer, R. Barton. “The Narrator in The Owl and the Nightingale: A Reader in the Text.” Chaucer Review 22, no. 4 (1988): 305-21.

In the following essay, Palmer analyzes the function of the narrator in The Owl and the Nightingale, examining how the poem eludes interpretation.

The appearance of Kathryn Hume's full-length study of the difficulties of interpretation posed by the Middle English Owl and the Nightingale has effectively silenced what had been, for the last three decades or so, a lively (if chaotic) debate over the meaning of the poem. Since Hume's persuasive debunking of a wide variety of previous hermeneutic claims in 1975, no new thoroughgoing reading, in fact, has been proposed. Thus her own view that this literary debate is a burlesque-satire which takes as its object “human contentiousness” has been unchallenged.1 Though I agree with Constance Hieatt that Hume has performed a “much-needed job of house-cleaning” by...

(read more)

This section contains 6,719 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by R. Barton Palmer
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by R. Barton Palmer from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.