The Merry Wives of Windsor | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of The Merry Wives of Windsor.

The Merry Wives of Windsor | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of The Merry Wives of Windsor.
This section contains 9,531 words
(approx. 32 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Frederick B. Jonassen

SOURCE: "The Meaning of Falstaff's Allusion to the Jack-a-Lent in The Merry Wives of Windsor " in Studies in Philology, Vol. 88, No. 1, Winter, 1991, pp. 46-68.

In the essay below, Jonassen identifies Falstaff as a "Jack-a-Lent," or scapegoat, who satirizes the powerful forces in the community even while he is himself being humiliated, thus restoring balance to the world of the play in the end.

I: the Allusion to the Jack-a-lent

The first time Sir John appears in 2 Henry IV, he is with his diminutive page who totters under the weight of Falstaff's huge "sword and buckler" (1.2.1-54).1 Aware of how the tiny figure accentuates his own bulk, Sir John calls the boy a "giant," and comments, "Men of all sorts take a pride to gird at me, . . . If the Prince put thee into my service for any other reason than to set me off, why then I have no...

(read more)

This section contains 9,531 words
(approx. 32 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Frederick B. Jonassen
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Frederick B. Jonassen from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.