The Marriage of Heaven and Hell | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.

The Marriage of Heaven and Hell | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 11 pages of analysis & critique of The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.
This section contains 3,142 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Harold Bloom

SOURCE: "Dialectic of The Marriage of Heaven and Hell," in William Blake's The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, Chelsea House Publishers, 1987, pp. 49-56.

In this seminal essay on the contraries, originally published in 1971, Bloom contends that The Marriage of Heaven and Hell is dialectical in both form and content.

The Marriage of Heaven and Hell assaults what Blake termed a "cloven fiction" between empirical and a priori procedure in argument. In content, the Marriage compounds ethical and theological "contraries"; in form it mocks the categorical techniques that seek to make the contraries appear as "negations." The unity of the Marriage is in itself dialectical, and cannot be grasped except by the mind in motion, moving between the Blakean contraries of discursive irony and mythical visualization.

Apocalypse is dialectical in the Marriage, as much so as in Shelley's Prometheus or the poems by Yeats written out of A Vision...

(read more)

This section contains 3,142 words
(approx. 11 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Harold Bloom
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Harold Bloom from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.