The Female Quixote; or, The Adventures of Arabella | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of The Female Quixote; or, The Adventures of Arabella.

The Female Quixote; or, The Adventures of Arabella | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of The Female Quixote; or, The Adventures of Arabella.
This section contains 5,493 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Joseph F. Bartolomeo

SOURCE: Bartolomeo, Joseph F. “Female Quixotism v. ‘Feminine’ Tragedy: Lennox's Comic Revision of Clarissa.” In New Essays on Samuel Richardson, edited by Albert J. Rivero, pp. 163-75. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996.

In the following essay, Bartolomeo deliberates on the intertextual relationship between The Female Quixote and Samuel Richardson's novels.

In regard to gender and eighteenth-century fiction, one of the largest obstacles to essentialism is the career of Samuel Richardson, whose plots, characters and narrative techniques both defined and constricted possibilities for women writers. An examination of his influence on one of his most accomplished admirers, Charlotte Lennox, appears to undermine essentialism even further. Although Lennox accepted Richardson's artistic advice while writing The Female Quixote and his practical assistance in publishing it,1 she eschewed such Richardsonian devices as the epistolary method, an emphasis on love and passion and an abundance of moral sentiments—devices commonly associated with “feminine...

(read more)

This section contains 5,493 words
(approx. 19 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Joseph F. Bartolomeo
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Joseph F. Bartolomeo from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.