Calendar | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of Calendar.

Calendar | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 17 pages of analysis & critique of Calendar.
This section contains 4,637 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by H. M. Nobis

SOURCE: “The Reaction of Astronomers to the Gregorian Calendar,” in Gregorian Reform of the Calendar, edited by G. V. Coyne, M. A. Hoskin, and O. Pedersen, Pontificia Academia Scientiarvm: Specola Vaticana, 1983, pp. 243-54.

In the following essay, Nobis details criticism of the Gregorian calendar reform by contemporary scientists.

This paper has a bearing not only on the history of chronology in particular, but on the history of science in general. The reaction of astronomers to the calendar reform provides us with a very good example of the general problems involved in such an undertaking, especially those deriving from the practical needs of society. Furthermore, we can see clearly how external non-scientific factors influenced scientists when their opinions were sought.

The Gregorian calendar reform has been studied by such authors as Kaltenbrunner,1 Schmidt,2 and Stiewe,3 to mention only the most important. I will restrict myself here to a few...

(read more)

This section contains 4,637 words
(approx. 16 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by H. M. Nobis
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by H. M. Nobis from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.