Susan Gubar | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Susan Gubar.

Susan Gubar | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Susan Gubar.
This section contains 886 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carolyn G. Heilbrun

SOURCE: “The Return of the Repressed,” in Washington Post Book World, Vol. 9, No. 16, November 25, 1979, pp. 4, 6.

In the following essay, Heilbrun praises The Madwoman in the Attic as a major work of feminist critical theory.

The pens of authorship have not only been, until the 19th century, entirely in the hands of men: the pen has also been male, a part of the male anatomy. Women could possess it only as a monstrosity. With the beginning of the 19th century, this attitude, taken less obviously for granted, began to be stated: Gerard Manly Hopkins called the artist's creative gift a male gift, a male quality. Jane Austen, Anthony Burgess latterly remarked, “lacks a strong male thrust.” Women who wrote, therefore, became by that act anomalous creatures.

Nor was this all. Woman had no story of her own; men have always told her this, and woman has believed it. She...

(read more)

This section contains 886 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Carolyn G. Heilbrun
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Carolyn G. Heilbrun from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.