Sex, lies, and videotape | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Sex, lies, and videotape.

Sex, lies, and videotape | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Sex, lies, and videotape.
This section contains 2,219 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Karen Jaehne

SOURCE: Jaehne, Karen. Review of sex, lies, and videotape, by Steven Soderbergh. Cineaste 17, no. 3 (1990): 38–40.

In the following review, Jaehne analyzes the themes of sexual politics and voyeurism in sex, lies, and videotape.

Sex, lies, and videotape sound like the ingredients for a one night stand, not the culmination of a masculine quest for liberation, as debut director Steven Soderbergh would have us believe. (The title lets us know e. e. cummings has met thirtysomething.) The two most interesting characters suffer from a sexual alienation prissy enough to preempt “Thanks for the memory” with “Thanks, but no thanks.” Ann (Andie MacDowell) can't bring herself to have sex with her husband, while Graham (James Spader), confessing to Ann that he can't get an erection in another person's presence, manages well enough alone by watching videotaped interviews he's made with women about their sex lives.

sex, lies, and videotape reminds one...

(read more)

This section contains 2,219 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Karen Jaehne
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Karen Jaehne from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.