Merrily We Roll Along | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Merrily We Roll Along.

Merrily We Roll Along | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Merrily We Roll Along.
This section contains 893 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Simon

SOURCE: “The Sour Smell of Success,” in New York, Vol. 27, No. 27, July 11, 1994, pp. 48–49.

In the following review of a revival of Merrily We Roll Along, Simon offers a negative assessment, focusing on Sondheim's lack of melody, the absence of character likability, and the weakness of the retrogressive structure of the musical.

The history of painting stretches from Anonymous to Untitled, from where only the work was essential to where the work can be anything at all and only the signature in the corner matters. Things may have come to the same pretty pass in the theater, with the pretentiously inflated, artistically bankrupt Passion a sure flop if it weren't for the prestigious signature “Stephen Sondheim” and, it must be admitted, the feebleness of the competition from Beauty and the Beast. Now, however, the York Theatre Company has revived Sondheim's 1981 fiasco, Merrily We Roll Along, so we can check...

(read more)

This section contains 893 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by John Simon
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by John Simon from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.