The Panda's Thumb (book) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of The Panda's Thumb (book).

The Panda's Thumb (book) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of The Panda's Thumb (book).
This section contains 3,962 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by P. B. Medawar

SOURCE: Medawar, P. B. “Back to Evolution.” New York Review of Books 28, no. 2 (19 February 1981): 34-6.

In the following review of The Panda's Thumb, Medawar comments on Gould's examinations of the Piltdown Man and the unusual opposable “thumb” of the panda.

When I reviewed Stephen Jay Gould's admirable Ever since Darwin a few years ago, I expressed the hope that he would not lay his pen aside for too long. I need not have worried, for Gould is a natural writer: he has something to say and the inclination and skill with which to say it. His present collection [The Panda's Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History] is a series of essays that would give special pleasure to scientists, but they are sufficiently relaxed to be read with enjoyment by laymen too. A casual reader flipping through his pages may wonder what Mickey Mouse is doing in chapter nine...

(read more)

This section contains 3,962 words
(approx. 14 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by P. B. Medawar
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by P. B. Medawar from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.