Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.

Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History.
This section contains 5,718 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert Wright

SOURCE: Wright, Robert. “The Intelligence Test.” New Republic 202, no. 5 (29 January 1990): 28-36.

In the following review, Wright asserts that Gould's “punctuated equilibria” theory in Wonderful Life is neither original nor relevant to the discussion of evolution.

The acclaim for Stephen Jay Gould is just shy of being universal. He was among the first to win a MacArthur Foundation “genius” award. His lectures are renowned among Harvard undergraduates for their wit and erudition. His monthly column in Natural History has a devout following, and when his essays are anthologized (The Panda's Thumb, The Flamingo's Smile, etc.), the reviews are reliably favorable and the sales enduringly brisk. All told, Gould probably commands the largest and most enthusiastic readership of any evolutionist in this century. But within one small audience, the cheers are muted. A number of evolutionary biologists complain—to each other, or to journalists off the record—that Gould has...

(read more)

This section contains 5,718 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Robert Wright
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Robert Wright from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.