Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle.

Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle.
This section contains 1,022 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Thomas D'Evelyn

SOURCE: D'Evelyn, Thomas. “Finding Patterns of Meaning in the Tick of Time.” Christian Science Monitor 79, no. 161 (15 July 1987): 21.

In the following review, D'Evelyn examines how Gould uses the metaphor of an arrow in Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle to compose a history of geology that focuses on three central geological thinkers.

Today, as in the Renaissance, the breakup of systems of thought releases great energy. Time and research have undermined the main modern ideologies of Marxism and Darwinism until some of their proponents consider them not so much scientific theories as research programs, not testworthy in themselves but still capable of inspiring good work.

Scientists have adapted to this situation in various ways. Some have yielded to the revisionist impulse—most notably, perhaps, Stephen Jay Gould. Furthermore, he's turned his position as professor of geology and curator in the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard and his columns in Natural...

(read more)

This section contains 1,022 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Thomas D'Evelyn
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Thomas D'Evelyn from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.