Close Encounters of the Third Kind | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Close Encounters of the Third Kind.

Close Encounters of the Third Kind | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Close Encounters of the Third Kind.
This section contains 228 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Stanley Kauffmann

Steven Spielberg, the writer and director [of Close Encounters of the Third Kind] has re-edited some bits of the original, put in some footage that was omitted first time, and shot some new footage….

It's a mistake. The second encounter isn't as good as the first. One special power of Close Encounters, I thought … was that it exemplified a Dionysian attribute of film: the exaltation available through film's technology and, therefore, repeatable—at will, more or less. Spielberg has interfered with its "immutability," which was probably a mistake in any event and is doubly so because he hasn't improved the picture….

The worst alteration is that we now follow [Roy] into the strangers' spaceship at the end and get a look at its immense interior. Nothing that Spielberg could show us could match what he had made us imagine. Seeing is believing less….

I don't get the idea...

(read more)

This section contains 228 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Stanley Kauffmann
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Stanley Kauffmann from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.