Shakespeare's Sonnets | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of Shakespeare's Sonnets.

Shakespeare's Sonnets | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of Shakespeare's Sonnets.
This section contains 6,579 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Russell Fraser

SOURCE: “Shakespeare at Sonnets,” in Singing Masters: Poets in English 1500 to the Present, University of Michigan Press, 1999, pp. 3-19.

In the following essay, Fraser analyzes Shakespeare's departures from standard sonnet form and argues that such deviations were intentional and serve to enhance the quality of the poetry.

I take my title from an essay of John Crowe Ransom's, collected in The World's Body (1938). “Shakespeare at Sonnets,” Ransom decided, wasn't up to the job, “not fit for amateurs.” This distinguished critic shied at “incoherence” and thought poetry should make as consistent sense as prose. Some poets, he said (in an essay on Millay, warming up for Shakespeare), adopted combinations of words that didn't quite fit into perfect meanings. That was fudging but seemed to them agreeable, the combination offering “the uncertain possibility of two meanings rather than the certainty of one.” A poem was even better when you doubted...

(read more)

This section contains 6,579 words
(approx. 22 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Russell Fraser
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Russell Fraser from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.