Cat People (1982 film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Cat People (1982 film).

Cat People (1982 film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Cat People (1982 film).
This section contains 289 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Lawrence O'toole

Paul Schrader's remake of the 1942 [Val Lewton/Jacques Tourneur] classic, Cat People, is no pussycat. Where the original wove a subtle spell, the new version goes for the throat. The difference between the two may well be an indication of how esthetic responses by film-makers to suspense and horror have become knee jerk and jejune. That is certainly not to say Cat People isn't effective—it's astonishingly and crudely so—but some may resent being pounced upon by such schlock. (p. 62)

Obviously, Schrader wanted to eroticize the original story, which he does on the most superficial level. There is probably no better example of the anthropomorphically erotic than the panther—the lean, taut, muscular body and the soft, padded feet and tail—but Schrader doesn't pursue the possibilities, opting for a fade-out just when our interest is pricked. Instead, he goes for the gore: a trainer's arm being...

(read more)

This section contains 289 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Lawrence O'toole
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Lawrence O'toole from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.