Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.

Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 19 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.
This section contains 4,967 words
(approx. 17 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Elsie Walker

SOURCE: Walker, Elsie. “Pop Goes the Shakespeare: Baz Luhrmann's William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet.Literature-Film Quarterly, 28, no. 2 (2000): 132-39.

In the review below, Walker examines Baz Luhrmann's 1996 film William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet, focusing on the way in which the film's intertextuality, as well as its choice of setting, encourages the audience's active response.

Baz Luhrmann's 1996 film, William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet, has attracted comparatively little critical attention even in the most recent collections of Shakespeare film criticism. Luhrmann's film is mentioned but in passing in the 1997 essay collection Shakespeare, The Movie: Popularizing the plays on film, TV, and video. In the 1998 “New Casebooks” collection of Shakespeare film essays Luhrmann's film is not mentioned at all, whereas Shakespeare films made after Luhrmann's (such as Kenneth Branagh's 1996 Hamlet) are already mentioned in the same breath as the aesthetically polemic films of Welles, Kozintsev, Olivier, and Kurosawa. The criticism of Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet to...

(read more)

This section contains 4,967 words
(approx. 17 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Elsie Walker
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Elsie Walker from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.