Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.

Romeo and Juliet | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Romeo and Juliet.
This section contains 1,062 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Jim Welsh

SOURCE: Welsh, Jim. “Postmodern Shakespeare: Strictly Romeo.Literature-Film Quarterly 25, no. 2 (April 1997): 152-53.

In the review that follows, Welsh comments that Baz Luhrmann's William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet is so visually outlandish that its faithfulness to the original play is arguable. Welsh additionally observes that many lines were cut and that a number of the actors were unable to successfully deliver Shakespeare's dialogue.

William Shakespeare's Romeo & Juliet is deceptively titled, because it is really Baz Luhrmann's Romeo & Juliet. Visually it is more Strictly Ballroom than strictly Romeo, though the dialogue—what survives of it—is strictly Shakespeare. It would get high marks if its evaluation were strictly verbal, perhaps, but the setting is so visually bizarre that its “fidelity” is questionable. The film's spectacle constantly overpowers and overwhelms the poetry. This Romeo & Juliet is packed with about as much exuberance as one might expect from writer Craig Pearce and director...

(read more)

This section contains 1,062 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Jim Welsh
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Jim Welsh from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.