Robert A. Heinlein | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Robert A. Heinlein.

Robert A. Heinlein | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Robert A. Heinlein.
This section contains 8,482 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by George Slusser

SOURCE: Slusser, George. “Heinlein's Fallen Futures.” Extrapolation 36, no. 2 (summer 1995): 96-112.

In the following essay, Slusser evaluates the impact of Heinlein's work, viewing him as “a national writer, one who carries into a new scientific century cultural and ethical patterns first conceived by nineteenth-century American thinkers and writers of ‘romance’.”

Robert Heinlein's long career has ended. Thus, there is the need, more urgent than ever, to assess the nature and importance of his work. But on what level should this assessment take place? The old-style fan saw Heinlein, both writer and public persona, as the quintessential SF writer and adulated him. Criticism of any sort was not tolerated, as I found out when my mid-seventies monographs were awarded the “galaxative award” by Spider Robinson in a hostile fan press. But SF readership has changed since then, and Heinlein has been placed in broader context—not necessarily to his advantage...

(read more)

This section contains 8,482 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by George Slusser
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by George Slusser from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.