Hannibal (film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Hannibal (film).

Hannibal (film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Hannibal (film).
This section contains 3,861 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Neil McDonald

SOURCE: McDonald, Neil. “Dr. Lecter, I Presume.” Quadrant 45, no. 4 (April 2001): 59-62.

In the following review, McDonald compares the novel Hannibal to Scott's film adaptation, noting that the film achieves a moral and dramatic complexity that is lacking in the novel.

Filmmakers saving a major writer from betraying his own creation? Unbelievable! Not really, because this is what screenwriters David Mamet and Steve Zaillian and director Ridley Scott have done in Hannibal for Thomas Harris, the author of the original novel.

When the book was published in 1999 director Jonathan Demme and screenwriter Ted Tally—both of whom had won Oscars for Silence of the Lambs based on Harris's earlier Hannibal Lecter novel—took one look at the new work and bailed out of the planned sequel. So did Jodie Foster. It was not that Harris had written a turkey. Far from it, much of Hannibal is very good indeed...

(read more)

This section contains 3,861 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Neil McDonald
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Neil McDonald from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.