Gladiator (2000 film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Gladiator (2000 film).

Gladiator (2000 film) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Gladiator (2000 film).
This section contains 988 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Kenneth Turan

SOURCE: Turan, Kenneth. “Russell Crowe's Muscular Performance, Stylish Battle Scenes and Rich Atmosphere Help Cut through the Shortcomings of Ridley Scott's Gladiator.Los Angeles Times (5 May 2000): F1.

In the following review, Turan offers a generally positive assessment of Gladiator, noting that the film spends “too much time on predictable plot twists.”

Gladiator delivers when it counts—but then and only then. Like an aging athlete who knows how to husband strength and camouflage weaknesses, it makes the most of what it does well and hopes you won't notice its limitations. With someone like Russell Crowe in the starring role, it doesn't have much to worry about.

An intensely masculine actor with the ability to be as thoroughly convincing in a tailored suit (The Insider) as in a suit of armor here, Crowe has a patent on heroic plausibility. Whether it's as commanding general Maximus, adored by the armed...

(read more)

This section contains 988 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Kenneth Turan
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Kenneth Turan from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.