Revenge play | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Revenge play.

Revenge play | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 32 pages of analysis & critique of Revenge play.
This section contains 8,706 words
(approx. 30 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Michael Neill

SOURCE: Neill, Michael. “Remembrance and Revenge: Hamlet, Macbeth and The Tempest.” In Jonson and Shakespeare, edited by Ian Donaldson, pp. 35-56. London: Macmillan, in association with Humanities Research Centre, Australian National University, Canberra, 1983.

In the following essay, Neill discusses the theme of revenge in Hamlet, Macbeth, and The Tempest. He asserts that Hamlet and Macbeth are antitypes—the first seeking to preserve the past and the second to obliterate it—and contends that both are destroyed by their obsession. By contrast, Neill suggests, Prospero redeems the past not by revenging it but by restoring it.

In this paper I shall be looking at three plays—Hamlet, Macbeth and The Tempest—as versions of revenge tragedy. I am not proposing any contentious reclassification. Shakespeare's contemporaries did not envisage a distinct species of drama called ‘revenge tragedy’: and the ‘genre’ is really only a modern abstraction from a recurrent set...

(read more)

This section contains 8,706 words
(approx. 30 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Michael Neill
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Michael Neill from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.