Revenge play | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Revenge play.

Revenge play | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 30 pages of analysis & critique of Revenge play.
This section contains 8,420 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Ronald Broude

SOURCE: Broude, Ronald. “Revenge and Revenge Tragedy in Renaissance England.” Renaissance Quarterly 28, No. 1 (Spring 1975): 38-58.

In the essay below, Broude attempts to recover the sixteenth-century understanding and usage of the term “revenge,” arguing that the modern-day interpretation of the term may unduly influence one's perception of the revenge tragedies.

When we speak of ‘revenge tragedy,’ we are often unaware of the extent to which our approach to these important Renaissance plays has been conditioned by the name we have given them. Elizabethans themselves recognized no distinct dramatic type called revenge play. The term is a modern one, made current at the turn of the century by A. H. Thorndike, and first defined at length by Fredson Bowers more than thirty years ago.1 As a critical term, it depends upon the modern meaning of revenge, and it simultaneously reflects and shapes both modern assumptions about the subject matter of...

(read more)

This section contains 8,420 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Ronald Broude
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Ronald Broude from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.