Revelation | Criticism

John of Patmos
This literature criticism consists of approximately 41 pages of analysis & critique of Revelation.

Revelation | Criticism

John of Patmos
This literature criticism consists of approximately 41 pages of analysis & critique of Revelation.
This section contains 11,383 words
(approx. 38 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by M. Eugene Boring

SOURCE: Boring, M. Eugene. Introduction to Revelation: Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, pp. 1-62. Louisville, Ky.: John Knox Press, 1989.

In the following excerpt, Boring presents an overview of some textual, language, and interpretative issues concerning Revelation.

Authorship

Unlike other writers of apocalyptic books, John gives his own name and writes in his own person, rather than under the assumed name of some figure of the past (cf. discussion of apocalyptic literature below). Such an assumption of another name was not necessary, for John and his churches no longer believed that the prophetic gift of the Holy Spirit was only a remembered aspect of the revered past. It was a matter of their own experience that the Spirit spoke again to the churches through Christian prophets (see 1:10; 2:7, 11, 17, 29; 3:6, 13, 22; 4:2; 22:17). While John claims to be a prophet, he makes no claim to being an apostle, and in fact distinguishes...

(read more)

This section contains 11,383 words
(approx. 38 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by M. Eugene Boring
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by M. Eugene Boring from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.