Reader-response criticism | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of Reader-response criticism.

Reader-response criticism | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of Reader-response criticism.
This section contains 9,946 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Terence R. Wright

SOURCE: Wright, Terence R. “Reader Response Under Review: Art, Game, or Science?” Style 29, no. 4 (winter 1995): 529-48.

In the following essay, Wright compares and contrasts a number of texts that address issues of reader response and interpretation, noting that work by such authors as Mikhail Bakhtin, Jacques Derrida, and Paul Ricoeur can also be classified in this genre of critical theory.

One of the problems of the label “Reader-Response Criticism” is that it covers a multitude of different approaches. Jane Tompkins's anthology, Reader-Response Criticism, originally published in 1980 but reprinted many times since then and still used as a course textbook, includes essays that could equally well be labelled New Critical, Phenomenological, Structuralist, Psychoanalytic, or Deconstructive. Her introduction claims that Reader-Response Criticism “could be said to have started with I. A. Richards's discussions of emotional response in the 1920s or with the work of D. W. Harding and Louise Rosenblatt...

(read more)

This section contains 9,946 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Terence R. Wright
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Terence R. Wright from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.