Reader-response criticism | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of Reader-response criticism.

Reader-response criticism | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of Reader-response criticism.
This section contains 6,684 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter J. Rabinowitz

SOURCE: Rabinowitz, Peter J. “Reader Response, Reader Responsibility: Heart of Darkness and the Politics of Displacement.” In Case Studies in Contemporary Criticism: Joseph Conrad, ‘Heart of Darkness,’ edited by Ross C. Murfin, pp. 131-47. Boston Mass.: Bedford Books of St. Martin's Press, 1996.

In the following essay, Rabinowitz presents a reader-response interpretation of Conrad's Heart of Darkness.

Even before Chinua Achebe proclaimed in 1975 that “Joseph Conrad was a bloody racist” (9),1 many critics had scrutinized the racial politics of Conrad's Heart of Darkness. But Achebe's stature as one of Africa's foremost novelists gave new urgency to the concerns about Conrad's ideology; and since then, it has been increasingly difficult to talk about the novel without coming to terms, either explicitly or implicitly, with Achebe's condemnation. Some critics have defended Conrad's political credentials. Brian W. Shaffer, for example, argues that Conrad's African fictions are “‘rejoinders’” to philosopher Herbert Spencer's “typology of...

(read more)

This section contains 6,684 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter J. Rabinowitz
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Peter J. Rabinowitz from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.