Hair (musical) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Hair (musical).

Hair (musical) | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 1 page of analysis & critique of Hair (musical).
This section contains 142 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Brendan Gill

Why on earth should anyone have wished to bring back "Hair"? Surely not for any reason as simple as making money. No, I Fear that its producers believed in it and will perhaps not understand why its return amounts to an embarrassment. The novelties that proved attractive almost a decade ago—the easygoing, not to say fugitive, book, the informal relations between audience and cast, and the endearing (and never very erotic) nudity—have lost their power to move us. Except for two or three charming songs, what remains is a sort of cold dregs, which fail to give us even the sorry satisfaction of tasting bitter. It is simply there, poor "Hair,"… all feverishly abustle and all, alas, lifeless.

Brendan Gill, "In the Anteroom," in The New Yorker (© 1977 by The New Yorker Magazine, Inc.), Vol. LIII, No. 35, October 17, 1977, P. 94.

(read more)

This section contains 142 words
(approx. 1 page at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Brendan Gill
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Brendan Gill from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.