Monty Python and the Holy Grail | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

Monty Python and the Holy Grail | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 2 pages of analysis & critique of Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
This section contains 319 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Penelope Gilliatt

["Monty Python and the Holy Grail"] is a cheerfully loused-up reworking of the legend of King Arthur's Grail hunt. This is the legend that has been such a nuisance to children and others…. [Almost everything] that has ever worried you about the Holy Grail, wimples, King Arthur, Malory, and the general mucking about of poets with the same old story is tackled head on. (p. 115)

In this version of the Grail-tale, King Arthur's knights are extremely cowardly, dirty, testy, and ill-starred…. The King himself, who hesitantly presents himself as Arthur, King of the Britons, to everyone he meets, has remarkably little effect on the lowly for a man of such high estate…. He seems exceptionally underprivileged as well as mentally underendowed. Perhaps this is because he is such an early king. He hasn't even got a horse…. [Many of the best debates in the film are yelled]. Musical...

(read more)

This section contains 319 words
(approx. 2 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Penelope Gilliatt
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Penelope Gilliatt from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.