Philipp Melanchthon | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of Philipp Melanchthon.

Philipp Melanchthon | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of Philipp Melanchthon.
This section contains 8,154 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Bruce T. Moran

SOURCE: Moran, Bruce T. “The Universe of Philip Melanchthon: Criticism and Use of the Copernican Theory.” Comitatus 4 (1973): 1-23.

In the following essay, Moran studies Melanchthon's intellectual background, particularly his ideas about physics and astronomy, and goes on to examine his attitude toward and understanding of Copernican astronomy.

In the statutes of 1582 for the University of Altdorf, founded 1578, it is left to the individual judgment of the mathematici to expound planetary theory according either to Ptolemy or Copernicus (vel Ptolemaei vel Copernici).1 This concession, that the Copernican hypothesis, as a mathematical construct, is as useful for the description and prediction of planetary movement as the Ptolemaic model, is evidence of a tradition which had long viewed astronomical hypotheses merely as attempts to save appearances rather than as descriptions of the real nature of things. Such a view of the Copernican theory was openly advocated by Philip Melanchthon at the...

(read more)

This section contains 8,154 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Bruce T. Moran
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Bruce T. Moran from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.