Penelope Fitzgerald | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Penelope Fitzgerald.

Penelope Fitzgerald | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 14 pages of analysis & critique of Penelope Fitzgerald.
This section contains 3,819 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Jonathan Raban

SOURCE: “The Fact Artist,” in New Republic, Vol. 221, No. 4,411, August 2, 1999, pp. 39–42.

In the following review, Raban lauds Fitzgerald’s ability to write as if from first-hand memory instead of historical research, especially in her Human Voices.

If Penelope Fitzgerald has ever fossicked in the stacks of the London Library in order to research the background for her novels, there is no trace of her labors in the books themselves. She always writes as if from first-hand memory. She cannot actually have lived in Germany in 1792, in Cambridge in 1912, in Moscow in 1913. Born in 1916, Fitzgerald still appears too young to have acquired the abundant, cosmopolitan knowledge of the world that irradiates her best work. She may well have been in Florence in 1955, and she probably worked for the BBC in 1940; but whether she is treating the recent past or the distant past, in England or elsewhere, she seems able...

(read more)

This section contains 3,819 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Jonathan Raban
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Jonathan Raban from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.