Oedipus the King | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Oedipus the King.
Related Topics

Oedipus the King | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 22 pages of analysis & critique of Oedipus the King.
This section contains 5,997 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Richard Fabrizio

SOURCE: “The Two Oedipuses: Sophocles, Anguillara, and the Renaissance Treatment of Myth,” in MLN, Vol. 110, No. 1, January, 1995, pp. 178-91.

In the following essay, Fabrizio examines how Giovanni Andrea dell'Anguillara, a Renaissance writer, dealt with what he deemed inconsistencies of characterization in his adaptation of Sophocles's text.

To discuss so minor a writer as Giovanni Andrea dell'Anguillara (ca. 1517-1571) seems like an exercise in willful obscurantism or personal enthusiasm for what is better dead and buried. Of course, it could be claimed with Ernst Robert Curtius and Aby Warburg that “God lurks in detail,” that only by a minute exploration of even the minor figures of a period can we achieve any synthesis and understanding of literary history. We are all aware from experience how often a second or even third rate writer illuminates more clearly than a master the mentality of a period. But a more tangible justification...

(read more)

This section contains 5,997 words
(approx. 20 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Richard Fabrizio
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Richard Fabrizio from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.