Norman Podhoretz | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Norman Podhoretz.

Norman Podhoretz | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 3 pages of analysis & critique of Norman Podhoretz.
This section contains 815 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Merle Rubin

SOURCE: Rubin, Merle. “Forthright Essays Reveal the World according to Podhoretz.” Christian Science Monitor 78, no. 125 (23 May 1986): 24.

In the following review, Rubin argues that, although Podhoretz is often wrong in his assumptions and at times too retractable in his beliefs, The Bloody Crossroads: Where Literature and Politics Meet is both a stimulating and engaging collection of essays.

Controversy has always been Norman Podhoretz's element. As editor of the magazine Commentary, he reminds us, he was among the first to publish substantive criticism of American involvement in Southeast Asia, back in the early 1960s. Yet, by 1982, he was arguing in his book Why We Were in Vietnam that our cause had essentially been a noble one.

These days, he castigates Ronald Reagan and his administration for being too “soft.” Although Podhoretz's steady march rightward has occasioned much comment, it is, I think, particularly telling that the event that caused the...

(read more)

This section contains 815 words
(approx. 3 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Review by Merle Rubin
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Review by Merle Rubin from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.