Noh | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 31 pages of analysis & critique of Noh.

Noh | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 31 pages of analysis & critique of Noh.
This section contains 8,434 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Roy E. Teele

SOURCE: Teele, Roy E. “The Structure of the Japanese Noh Play.” In Chinese and Japanese Music-Dramas, edited by J. I. Crump and William P. Mann, pp. 189-212. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, 1975.

In the following essay, Teele discusses the structure of the Noh play, presenting an abstract construct of an ideal play and holding his model up against several popular works of different types, including ceremonial or congratulatory plays, warrior plays, woman plays, and various “problem” plays.

Any attempt to study the structure of the Japanese Noh play must perforce start with Zeami Motokiyo, its greatest practitioner and critic. Therefore, at the risk of repeating what is known to most students of the Noh, let us begin by discussing Zeami's Nōsakushō, “Treatise on Writing Noh Plays.” He begins:

Involved in writing a Noh play are three elements (sandō, “three ways”): materials, construction...

(read more)

This section contains 8,434 words
(approx. 29 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Roy E. Teele
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Roy E. Teele from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.