Nicholas Udall | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of Nicholas Udall.

Nicholas Udall | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 18 pages of analysis & critique of Nicholas Udall.
This section contains 5,185 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William L. Edgerton

SOURCE: Edgerton, William L. “Floures for Latine Spekynge,” “Apophthegmes,” and “The Paraphrase of Erasmus.” In Nicholas Udall, pp. 68-81. New York: Twayne Publishers, Inc., 1965.

In the first essay below, Edgerton analyzes Floures for Latine Spekynge in terms of what it reveals about Tudor education and as its relationship to Ralph Roister Doister. In the second and third essays, he examines Udall's intentions and style in his translations of Erasmus.

Floures for Latine Spekynge

Floures for Latine Spekynge probably gives a better understanding of what actually was studied by Tudor schoolboys than the much better known Schoolmaster, by Roger Ascham. Floures is not a scolding admonition, by a schoolmaster who never taught in grammar schools, of what should be taught; but a good example of what the Tudor schoolboy actually studied. In fact, a perusal of Floures explains to some extent that love of words and sometimes exhausting prolixity...

(read more)

This section contains 5,185 words
(approx. 18 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William L. Edgerton
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by William L. Edgerton from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.