Nathaniel Lee | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of Nathaniel Lee.

Nathaniel Lee | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 15 pages of analysis & critique of Nathaniel Lee.
This section contains 3,871 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by A. L. Cooke and Thomas B. Stroup

SOURCE: Cooke, A. L., and Thomas B. Stroup. “The Political Implications in Lee's Constantine the Great.Journal of English and Germanic Philology 49, no. 4 (October 1950): 506-15.

In this essay, Cooke and Stroup argue that Constantine the Great was a political play that made veiled references to contemporary events, including the Popish Plot and the Rye House Plot.

Several scholars have called attention to a few political echoes in Nathaniel Lee's last play, Constantine the Great (D.L., Nov., 1683). Montague Summers lists Arius as one of the stage characters who satirize Shaftesbury.1 Roswell Ham in his biography of Lee ignores the political implications of the play altogether.2 Ghosh discusses the political references of the prologue and epilogue, but he is not concerned with the political implications in the play itself.3 Häfele in the preface to his edition of Constantine, 1933, deals more fully with the reflections of contemporary politics in...

(read more)

This section contains 3,871 words
(approx. 13 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by A. L. Cooke and Thomas B. Stroup
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by A. L. Cooke and Thomas B. Stroup from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.