Nathaniel Lee | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of Nathaniel Lee.

Nathaniel Lee | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 29 pages of analysis & critique of Nathaniel Lee.
This section contains 8,202 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Richard Brown

SOURCE: Brown, Richard. “The Dryden-Lee Collaboration: Oedipus and The Duke of Guise.Restoration 9, no. 1 (1985): 12-25.

In the essay below, Brown focuses on two plays written collaboratively by Lee and John Dryden—Oedipus and The Duke of Guise—maintaining that Lee's contribution to the plays was every bit as great as that of his more famous contemporary.

The fruits of the John Dryden-Nathaniel Lee dramatic collaboration, Oedipus (1678) and The Duke of Guise (1682), have met disparagement and neglect in our century.1 Oedipus is supposed “an incredibly sensational melodrama,” a “travesty” of Sophocles; The Duke is sometimes called an embarrassing Tory propaganda play, in which Lee abandoned his Whig principles either in despair or under Dryden's domination.2 Still, both works attracted wide notice in the Restoration, Oedipus in part for a reason of permanent interest: the place of such lurid emotionalism in the history of tragedy (recommended, in Dryden's Preface, by...

(read more)

This section contains 8,202 words
(approx. 28 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Richard Brown
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Richard Brown from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.