The Unfortunate Traveller | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of The Unfortunate Traveller.

The Unfortunate Traveller | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 21 pages of analysis & critique of The Unfortunate Traveller.
This section contains 6,265 words
(approx. 21 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Fredson T. Bowers

SOURCE: "Thomas Nashe and the Picaresque Novel," in Humanistic Studies in Honor of John Calvin Met-calf, University of Virginia, 1941, pp. 12-27.

In the following essay, Bowers analyzes The Unfortunate Traveller as a picaresque work, concluding that while imperfect, it does, nonetheless, qualify as the first English picaresque novel.

Whether Thomas Nashe's Unfortunate Traveller (1593) may accurately be classed as a picaresque novel has been variously debated. At one extreme stands Jusserand, who calls the work the best specimen of the picaresque in English anterior to Defoe;1 at the opposite pole is McKerrow: "I see practically nothing in the work which can have been suggested by the picaresque type of romance, such as Lazarillo de Tormes. Indeed, it seems to me that the classing of it with such stories is hardly correct."2 Various other critics have taken an interme diate position. Baker writes: "Nashe may have heard of Lazarillo de...

(read more)

This section contains 6,265 words
(approx. 21 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Fredson T. Bowers
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Fredson T. Bowers from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.