Much Ado About Nothing | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of Much Ado About Nothing.

Much Ado About Nothing | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 25 pages of analysis & critique of Much Ado About Nothing.
This section contains 6,913 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by C. O. Gardner

SOURCE: Gardner, C. O. “Beatrice and Benedick.” Theoria 49 (October 1977): 1-17.

In the following essay, Gardner argues that Beatrice and Benedick in Much Ado about Nothing are not always given their full due as lively, exciting, and even weighty characters.

Another essay on Beatrice and Benedick! … This one is offered, needless to say, in the belief that there is still more to be said about them. It is not offered, however, in the belief that most of what has been said so far is false. On the contrary, my impression is that, though misinterpretations and inadequate accounts have of course been perpetrated, a fairly large proportion of what has been written about these two characters—and perhaps indeed about Shakespeare's work in general—is valid. Shakespeare was, as Coleridge has said, myriad-minded; many different intuitions about the plays and many different points of view seem to be able to...

(read more)

This section contains 6,913 words
(approx. 24 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by C. O. Gardner
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by C. O. Gardner from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.