Tales of the South Pacific | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Tales of the South Pacific.
Related Topics

Tales of the South Pacific | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 4 pages of analysis & critique of Tales of the South Pacific.
This section contains 942 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Herbert Mitgang

James A. Michener won the Pulitzer Prize in 1947 for his first novel, Tales of the South Pacific. It can be predicted that he will not receive a second Pulitzer for his new novel and twenty-third book, The Covenant…. It can also be predicted that … the novel will soar to the top of the best-seller lists in this country and be read and admired all over the world.

Michener's reputation among critics has declined—even as his popularity has soared—since Tales of the South Pacific. Those short stories were admired by Orville Prescott [see excerpt above] … as "fresh, original and moving," and Prescott's reviews helped to start the encomiums that eventually led to Michener's Pulitzer Prize.

When Michener wrote The Fires of Spring (1949), about a writer's search for integrity, he moved on to more familiar ground. This time, several reviewers found his theme, in fact, overfamiliar and his...

(read more)

This section contains 942 words
(approx. 4 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Herbert Mitgang
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Herbert Mitgang from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.