Blowup | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Blowup.

Blowup | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 8 pages of analysis & critique of Blowup.
This section contains 2,161 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter Lev

SOURCE: “Blow-Up, Swinging London, and the Film Generation,” in Literature-Film Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, April, 1989, pp. 134–37.

In the following essay, Lev examines Blow-Up in the context of its “social-cultural moment.”

Blow-Up must be approached from the dual perspectives of art and commerce. It is certainly a key film in the distinguished artistic career of Michelangelo Antonioni, one of the world’s great film directors. Blow-Up has excellent credentials as an art film: script and direction by Antonioni, based on a story by the Argentine modernist Julio Cortazar, and with an emphasis on theme and visual imagery rather than on genres or stars. Yet Blow-Up must also be considered an entry into the world of big-budget commercial filmmaking: produced by Carlo Ponti for MGM, made in London at a time when that city was exporting popular culture (films, music, fashion) around the world.

The artistic aspects of Blow-Up have monopolized...

(read more)

This section contains 2,161 words
(approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Peter Lev
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Peter Lev from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.