Michael Madhusudan Dutt | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 47 pages of analysis & critique of Michael Madhusudan Dutt.

Michael Madhusudan Dutt | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 47 pages of analysis & critique of Michael Madhusudan Dutt.
This section contains 6,693 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William Radice

SOURCE: Radice, William. “Milton and Madhusudan.” In Literature East and West: Essays Presented to R. K. DasGupta, edited by G. R. Taneja and Vinod Sena, pp. 177-94. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Limited, 1995.

In the following essay, Radice compares Dutt's The Slaying of Meghanada with John Milton's Paradise Lost.

Michael Madhusudan Datta (1824-73) was not as great a poet as John Milton. As an Englishman, I can say this without fear of apparent condescension, for Madhusudan himself would have agreed. In his flamboyant English letters, we find that the only limit to his ambition and self-confidence was set by Milton. After the publication, in 1861, of the first two books of Meghnād-badh Kābya, he wrote to his friend Rajnarayan Basu:

The Poem is rising into splendid popularity. Some say it is better than Milton—but that is all bosh—nothing can be better than Milton; many say it...

(read more)

This section contains 6,693 words
(approx. 23 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by William Radice
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by William Radice from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.