Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.

Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 37 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.
This section contains 10,108 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Cynthia Lewis

SOURCE: Lewis, Cynthia. “‘Dark Deeds Darkly Answered’: Duke Vincentio and Judgment in Measure for Measure.Shakespeare Quarterly 34, no. 3 (autumn 1983): 271-89.

In the following essay, Lewis evaluates the character of the Duke as the means through which Shakespeare examined the imperfections of the monarchy in Measure for Measure.

Unlike many Shakespearean plays that concern justice and human judgment, Measure for Measure opens with a clear-cut statement of its moral standard, an ideal, of sorts, which Duke Vincentio urges Angelo to achieve:

Mortality and mercy in Vienna Live in thy tongue and heart.(1) 

From the start, the Duke calls for moderation in judgment, for a balance between exact punishment and forgiveness that, throughout the play, will remain a touchstone. Measure for Measure explores both the ultimate possibility of realizing this standard and the extent to which its characters, particularly the Duke, meet such a challenge.

I

Whether the Duke ultimately...

(read more)

This section contains 10,108 words
(approx. 34 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Cynthia Lewis
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Cynthia Lewis from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.