Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.

Measure for Measure | Criticism

This literature criticism consists of approximately 36 pages of analysis & critique of Measure for Measure.
This section contains 10,333 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Susan Carlson

SOURCE: Carlson, Susan. “‘Fond Fathers’ and Sweet Sisters: Alternative Sexualities in Measure for Measure.Essays in Literature 16, no. 1 (Spring 1989): 13-31.

In the following essay, Carlson stresses non-traditional expressions of sexuality in Measure for Measure that stand against the male-dominated sexual order.

Measure for Measure insists on defining its women in terms of their sexual relations to men. Such definition is clearest in the play's final scene when the Duke concludes Mariana must be “nothing” if she is not maid, widow, or wife (V.i.177-78).1 The definition is corroborated by Lucio with his addition of a more tawdry fourth alternative, “punk,” to the unchallenged list of female types. Many critics responding to the play in recent years have explored this seeming equation of a woman's worth with her sexuality to conclude that the play's sexual attitudes result from a persistent male fear of women.2 Their feminist connection between...

(read more)

This section contains 10,333 words
(approx. 35 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Critical Essay by Susan Carlson
Copyrights
Gale
Critical Essay by Susan Carlson from Gale. ©2005-2006 Thomson Gale, a part of the Thomson Corporation. All rights reserved.